Now Who’s in Charge Here?

This was sent as a reply to Rep. Henry, after we talked on the phone today, on a radio talk show; I didn’t get to finish what I was saying about Jeff Sessions; there are a few things that are extremely important. You express great confidence and Jeff Sessions, but if you look at what’s happening I think your confidence is misplaced.
Here is why, Rosenstein justified under penalty of perjury before Congress that the dossier was the source and basis, it is a portrait of perjury, yet when he testified he did not know that the disclosure of his intricate involvement in issuing the FISA warrant that was based on perjury would be made public or even available to Donald Trump; and that too is accurate, true?
However, he was not just involved in its original issuance, but he was also involved in a subsequently continued authorization. This is not your normal title III eavesdropping warrant, I would assume you agree with that? What that means is that to continue a FISA warrant to have to be a series of events occur; first, you have to certify that an American citizen is, in fact, an agent of the foreign government, secondly to continue the FISA warrant you have to show significant progress for its continuation or lie about it.
If not they would have to go to a regular federal district court, which would have been discovered, under 18 U.S. Code § 2518 – Procedure for interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications, in this case, Ron Rosenstein signed off on the 3 additional extensions of that perjured warrant. So would you agree?
So let’s look at the deep state. You have James Comey, that covered for Hillary, then put in for a job FBI director, for Donald Trump. Unbeknownst to even many Democrats; Comey as Peter, Lisa Page, McCabe, Rosenstein, and yes Mueller they are devout Deep State allies of Hillary Clinton and their cause which is why he ‘reopened’ the ‘investigation’ involving Huma to kill it, just before the election.
FYI, Anthony Weiner’s for his communications usually used Facebook messenger not regular emails on his computer. It is important to understand that Huma was an unregistered agent for the reigning government and the Saudis, their connection/ or cohesion was with the Muslim Brotherhood, and those stored emails were to be used for blackmail on Hillary Clinton when she became ‘president’
Remember, James Comey had already exonerated Hillary once but was forced and had to, pretend to reopen Hillary’s investigation, the people/ FBI special agents that went into Anthony Weiner’s computer, discovered 625,000 emails most of them generated by Clinton operatives many from the State Department and the Clinton of all foundation/information, generated by Huma and Hillary, and among those were the allegedly destroyed 33,000 missing emails, those included passwords and identity of assets in the Middle East for the CIA, some were caught and killed because they been compromised by that breach of 18 USC 793, an act they tried to blame Edward Snowden for, his was the vault 7 intel the CIA leaked to Julian Assange, involving domestic spying on US citizens. Snowden did not have access that information, but they attempted to blame him as a cover for Hillary Clinton’s growing list of illegal acts {now spanning over four decades}.
Consequently, if a damage assessment was done, both Huma and Hillary would be looking at life imprisonment at a minimum!
Even Democrats, are suspicious of the all too often “song sung” by the deep state” from IRS to Hillary, “THE EMAILS had been “destroyed” “gone missing”, just like judicial watches request for meeting between Bill Clinton and then attorney general Loretta Lynch meeting on the tarmac BS spin talking points. Many want answers as to how two agentsPeter Strzok and Lisa Page went missing, and why the custodian of those records was arrested for obstruction of justice? for the attempt to destroy them.
The pushback within the agency became so great that James Comey had to reopen to use it as a cover to stop a full-blown whistleblowing rebellion within the FBI. Now remember Donald Trump did not know all of these operative facts, and that is the reason that Rosenstein recommended firing of James Comey, was to hide the deep state operation of the “secret society”of which Andy McCabe was basically the CEO and Rosenstein was protecting the operations agenda, when he told Jeff Sessions, ‘he should recuse himself from everything Russian’ which is why Rosenstein appointed deep state operative, long time friend of Jaomes Comey, Robert Mueller, and why James Comey demanded a special prosecutor which Rosenstein was the one who appointed Robert Mueller, remember Mueller is an alleged Republican of course so his deep state operative John McCain. Comey seeks a job which should’ve been Jeff Sessions to do. Rosenstein and FBI director Ray never expected the information in the memo, proved Rosenstein’s heavy involvement with attacking and the coup d’état against, Donald Trump both before and after the election. Now here’s the important question; Rosenstein is at the center of this conspiracy he is running the Department of Justice or as I call them that Department of “just us”, is a conspirator against president Donald Trump. Now would you allow someone to work for you that at actually documented they use perjury and plotted against you illegally?
Rosenstein is running the Justice Department, how effective with a conspirator running your DOJ do you seriously think Jeff Sessions is going to be unless he fires Rosenstein and if he doesn’t work you think you have over Jeff Sessions to gain his cooperation in acquiescence to the deep state plodding along? there’s a lot more to this but that’s sufficient for now.
Then consider the fact that James Comey is actually on the Board of Directors of the Bank of London; Robert Mueller and James Comey were involved in Waco too for Janet Reno. then factor in the fact that the fake perjured dossier against Donald Trump, was also supplied by John McCain with Lindsey Graham’s blessing. Allow me to pose another question? How did John McCain get his hands on the dossier, if not from James Comey, Andrew aka Andy McCabe or Rosenstein? John McCain is a deeply operative and part of that secret societies and McCain is the insurance agent for the conspiratorial insurance program! John McCain passes dossier alleging secret Trump-Russia contacts to FBI | US news | The Guardian

God is in the Details (and he is EXCELLENT at math)

For decades it has been somewhat of a mystery to secularists as to why our solar system is structured the way it is: the four gas giants—Saturn and Jupiter, composed mainly of helium and hydrogen, and Uranus and Neptune—orbiting far away from the sun, and the four smaller rocky planets, the terrestrials—Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars—orbiting much closer to the sun.

Astronomers are puzzled that other recently discovered planetary systems look so different from ours. One evolutionist stated, “There are so many surprises in this field—almost nothing is turning out as we expected.”1 Indeed, for the secular astronomer, basic planet construction is caught on the horns of a dilemma.

The predicament is this: Planet formation must occur quickly before the protoplanet is pulled into the star it’s orbiting, but getting tiny bits of protoplanet dust to join up into nice, round spheres and thence into a proper planet has not been found to work. Many stars in our Milky Way possess spinning disks of matter—orbiting gas and dust—but there are three significant problems in forming planets from these ingredients: death spirals, accretion (the gradual growth of planets by the accumulation of debris), and turbulence.2 The building of planets large and small is an enigma, and “many aspects of the formation of the giant planets remain unresolved.”3 An evolutionist writing in the prestigious Nature journal stated,

The discovery of thousands of star systems wildly different from our own has demolished ideas about how planets form. Astronomers are searching for a whole new theory.4

But even if our neighboring planets somehow formed quickly from accumulating space dust, recently discovered exoplanets (extrasolar planets) have changed secular solar system formation theory.5 Ours is certainly unique: “Today we know that planetary systems are quite common, but in many cases the ones we see differ significantly from our own.”6Finkbeiner concurs, stating, “Perhaps the biggest question is why our Solar System is so different.”7

Exceptional star systems require, well, an exceptional star:

There are many factors that would make a star system too hostile for life to even get started, let alone survive for any period long enough to evolve. So what sort of star provides the perfect conditions for a habitable planet elsewhere in the universe?8

It so happens our sun provides the perfect conditions. It’s not too small (i.e., too dim or too cool) or too big (producing unfortunate charbroiled results from simply being too hot). Compared to the intense and violent activity seen on other stars, our sun is remarkably even-tempered and well-mannered—it doesn’t flare or pulse like other stars. When solar flares do occur, they are not so violent as to vaporize our oceans…or worse.

On the local level, our moon is equally amazing, leading two secular authors to ask, “Who built the Moon?” Knight and Butler state, “The Moon is 400 times smaller than the star at the centre of our solar system, yet it is also just 1/400th of the distance between the Earth and the Sun.” Consequently, the moon and sun appear exactly the same size in Earth’s sky—making precise solar eclipses possible. The authors also say, “By some absolutely incomprehensible quirk of nature, the Moon also manages to precisely imitate the perceived annual movements of the Sun each month.”9

Another secular author expressed surprise at the moon’s amazing orbit:

The Moon’s orbit is fiendishly difficult to explain, moving as it does around a rotating Earth, which together form [essentially] a ‘double-planet’ system that orbits around the Sun. It is a classic example of a three-dimensional, gravitational three-body problem.10

After seeing the precise placement of our planets with their right distances, masses, gravitational attractions, and orbital characteristics, is it any wonder one evolutionist said,

You might also think that these disparate bodies are scattered across the solar system without rhyme or reason. But move any piece of the solar system today, or try to add anything more, and the whole construction would be thrown fatally out of kilter. So how exactly did this delicate architecture come to be?11

Move any piece and it throws the whole solar system fatally out of kilter? Sounds like it must have been set up in a delicate balance—a precisely orchestrated cosmic dance, if you will—from the very beginning. A French astrophysicist confirms the remarkable precision of our outer planets’ relationship to Earth:

Jacques Laskar discovered that the orbits of Jupiter and Saturn keep the earth’s orbit from becoming chaotic. Without the orbital stability produced by Jupiter and Saturn, the earth’s orbit would make extreme changes, causing instability in our climate and making the earth uninhabitable.12

To conclude, our solar system is so unique that Mike Brown, a secular astronomer at Caltech, bemoaned, “It really is something that I find deeply weird….What does it all mean? I don’t know.”13

Lovesblues commentary: Well I call it Genesis and DIVINE. Another in the many pointers that all you need to do is simply OPEN your EYES to understand that there was a guiding hand in the creation of our earth, and ourselves.

“Almost nothing is turning out as we expected,” “astronomers are searching for a whole new theory,” “by some absolutely incomprehensible quirk of nature,” “fiendishly difficult to explain,” “fatally out of kilter,” “deeply weird”—these comments don’t seem very scientific. They reflect the desperation of the secular scientists’ worldview.

The satisfying answer to the question of our solar system’s origin is found in the opening pages of Genesis. Our solar system was designed complete, intact, and perfectly balanced by the Creator, for the full benefit of us His creatures, during the creation week just thousands of years ago.


  1. Woo, M. Y. 2010. Discovering New Worlds. Engineering & Science. 73 (3): 18-23.
  2. Asphaug, E. 2009. Growth and Evolution of Asteroids. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 37: 413-48.
  3. Chaisson, E. and S. McMillan. 2014. Astronomy Today. Boston: Pearson Publishers, 154.
  4. Finkbeiner, A. 2014. Astronomy: Planets in chaos. Nature. 511 (7507): 22-24.
  5. Chambers, J. E. 2009. Planetary Migration: What Does It Mean for Planet Formation? Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 37: 321-344.
  6. Chaisson and McMillan, Astronomy Today, 379.
  7. Finkbeiner, Astronomy: Planets in chaos.
  8. Nicholson, B., B. Carter, and J. Horner. For life to form on a planet it needs to orbit the right kind of star. The Conversation. Posted on December 1, 2014, accessed September 21, 2015.
  9. Knight, C. and A. Butler. 2005. Who Built the Moon? London: Watkins Publishing, 4-5.
  10. Dumé, B. Moon’s bulge linked to early orbitPhysicsWeb. Posted on August 3, 2006, accessed September 21, 2015.
  11. Webb, R. 2009. Unknown solar system 1: How was the solar system built? New Scientist. 2693: 31.
  12. Bickel, B. and S. Jantz. 2001. Creation & Evolution 101: A Guide to Science and the Bible in Plain Language. Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers.
  13. Krulwich, R. Our Very Normal Solar System Isn’t Normal AnymoreNational Public Radio. Posted on May 7, 2013, accessed September 1, 2015.

* Mr. Sherwin is Research Associate, Senior Lecturer, and Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Cite this article: Frank Sherwin, M.A. 2015. The Perfect Balance of Our Solar SystemActs & Facts. 44 (12).


Bathymetry Study of the Kick-‘em-Jenny Volcano

Kick-’em-Jenny is a submarine volcano located near Grenada in the Lesser Antilles.



In 1939, a major eruption sent volcanic material up to 300 meters into the air, signaling the potential growth of a new island. Seismometers have recorded further activity approximately once a decade, but these events are rarely observed directly. Scientists therefore understand little about what is happening at the volcano that is approximately 190 meters below the sea surface.

In a new study in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, a journal of the American Geophysical Union, scientists conducted bathymetric surveys of the volcano in 2016 and 2017. They combined this with four previous surveys of the volcano, made between 1985 and 2014, covering a number of these periods of unrest. This movie shows two of those surveys: a 2017 survey performed by the R.R.S. James Cook, which shows a close-up view of the cone of Kick-‘em-Jenny and a 3D rendering of the gas released during that survey; and a regional 2013 survey collected by the R/V Nautilus.

Not to be confused with the  Nautilus Institute

Rather than a growing cone, the study’s authors observed several small landslides from the flanks of Kick-’em-Jenny. In recent decades, far more material has fallen away from the cone than has been added in eruptions, with some parts of the volcano growing and collapsing with regularity. This type of behavior is also seen in the handful of other studied underwater volcanoes worldwide, suggesting it is a common process. In the next stage of the project, the study’s authors try to further decode the seismic signals in the light of these volcanic processes to aid future monitoring of the volcano.

Read the full study at:…

Video Animation by: IVS Fledermaus

Video Produced by AGU

AGU video
Music by: departures by airtone (c) copyright 2015 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial (3.0) license.… Ft: speck
Science & Technology
Standard YouTube License

Bryan Zollinger Accuses O’bama of Staging Unrest

Rep. shares article saying Charlottesville was ‘set-up’
Posted: August 18, 2017 5:24 p.m.

Screenshot from Rep. Bryan Zollinger’s personal Facebook account. Facebook
Idaho Falls Rep. Bryan Zollinger took to Facebook on Friday, re-posting a conspiracy theory suggesting that the tragic events in Charlottesville, Va., could have been an inside job orchestrated to smear President Donald Trump.
The post, written on a site called “The American Thinker,” is replete with wild, unevidenced claims couched in what-ifs.
“The conflagration in Charlottesville is beginning to feel like a set-up, perhaps weeks or months in the planning,” the author wrote.
In a comment, Zollinger called the blog post “completely plausible.”
The post suggests, at various points, that the white supremacist demonstration in Charlottesville, which resulted in brawls with counterprotestors and an apparent terrorist attack that left Heather Heyer dead and 19 others injured, may have been plotted by former President Barack Obama, billionaire George Soros, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe or Charlottesville Mayor Mike Signer — or by some shadowy cabal involving them all.
And it describes both white supremacists and those who protested against them as “groups of demented racists.”
“All of them on both sides are certainly that,” the author wrote, while making an exception for Heyer, whose funeral was held Wednesday.
The post begins by reciting a claim that Obama “set up a war room in his D.C. home to plan and execute resistance to the Trump administration.” That claim, widely debunked by fact checkers but widely circulated by far-right news outlets, stems from an article in a London tabloid, which cites a single unnamed source claiming to be a friend of Obama’s. There is no further sourcing for the claim, though the claim was recently repeated by the National Enquirer using the phrase “war room.”
It then recites further claims, some with kernels of truth, others with none, to make the case that the white supremacist rally could have been staged.


“So were the events of Saturday the result of a despicable plan to further undermine Trump?,” the author wrote. “There was plenty of time and Charlottesville is the ‘capital of resistance.’ If it was, it was evil and deadly and the people involved need to be prosecuted. Or is this a wild conspiracy theory? Perhaps. But the pieces fit.”
“Bryan, you have to know this is crazy, right?” one commenter wrote on Zollinger’s post.
“I’m not saying it is true, but I am suggesting that it is completely plausible,” Zollinger responded, adding that “many of the protesters were Soros-funded.”
In an interview, Zollinger said he hadn’t meant to offend anyone with the post, and that on further reflection, its claims are “probably wrong.” He continued to describe the claims as “plausible,” however.
“In hindsight, maybe it was a mistake to post it,” Zollinger said. “I didn’t mean for it to ruffle any feathers.”
Zollinger represents District 33, which encompasses most of Idaho Falls. He was elected in 2016, replacing former Rep. Linden Bateman, who didn’t seek re-election. Zollinger has served one term in the House, where he became one of the founding members of the Idaho Freedom Caucus.


Reporter Bryan Clark can be reached at 208-542-6751.