Other than appealing looks, I like very little about this prez…
He is so ARROGANT in his use of “EXECUTive Orders” that I think Congress needs to place SEVERE restrictions or eliminate their future use completely.
I have always felt his behavior on 9/11/12 was suspicious; the same way I felt Juniors was on 9/11/01…
RELEASE your Emails Prez, if you’ve nothing to hide, why fan a fire you want put out?
1) “there is an enormous difference between politicizing tragedy and using the levers of government to achieve that goal. Put simply, the transformation of the Benghazi attacks into a political drama now serves as one of the most dangerous precedents in American history, one whose absurdity and irrationality can be seen just by reviewing the past. This single Benghazi committee has been “investigating” the attack for longer than Congress conducted inquiries into Pearl Harbor, 9/11, Iran-Contra, Watergate and intelligence failures in Iraq.
Worse still, Congress convened 22 hearings about the 9/11 attack that killed almost 3,000 citizens working in the World Trade Center in downtown Manhattan; this week, Congress will be holding its 21st hearing about an attack that killed four people working in Libya, with many more sessions left to come. Do Republicans actually think that terrorists killing four agents of the government who willingly assumed the risks of residing in one of the most dangerous places in the world is more important than terrorists murdering 3,000 unsuspecting civilians who were working at their offices in New York City?
In fact, no previous assault on a diplomatic outpost has received this kind of relentless expression of congressional outrage. There weren’t investigations that were anything on this scale about the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Beirut in 1983 (63 killed), on the U.S. Embassy annex northeast of Beirut in 1984 (24 killed) or on the U.S. Embassy in Sanaa, Yemen, in 2008 (18 killed). Republicans didn’t believe these exact same scenarios that took place under Republican presidents merited similar zeal to dig down to some unexposed, imaginary “truth.”
Newsweek really showed their anti-conservative stripes in this article on Benghazi Hearings, comparing them to the 9/11/01 hearings (or lack thereof). At first I thought it was because they thought that the Bush regime lied and weren’t taken to task (which is my opinion), but now I believe it is because they simply want a socialist America. You know that “It Takes a Village” load of crap the Hillary’s of this world spew when they want to take your kids and indoctrinate them into their happy horseshit agenda… The one where fluoride is added to drinking water because it makes your teeth strong, and vaccines are mandatory or you can’t go to school. The liberal agenda is disguised as freedom, but it is the opposite. They want a world where they control you the Steeple… Conservatives want free enterprise, and a strong military. However, both of these groups are corrupt and it is now time you sheeple take a stand, READ the Constitution and then hold ALL of the accountable,.